Crime+Scene+Script



media type="custom" key="4717255"My name is Detective Ruch. Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene, a two bedroom one bathroom beach house. The alleged victim was Felix Navidad, a young man who recently inherited a small fourtune from his parents, who were killed in a freak bungey-jumping accident. The suspect guilty of committing this crime is Kendra Goode. She knew she was in Felix's will and wanted his money. This suspect was confirmed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene. The most incriminating piece of evidence collected was the white towel. It was found in the garbage can at the crime scene. It had her initals on it, which proves she was there. She put Gene's cologne on it to cover herself. Another piece of evidence was Kendra's fingerprints. The evidence was found on Felix's cup which was near his body. The test performed was fingerprint comparason. The results of the test matched her fingerprints exactly. This connects the suspect to the crime by showing she tampered with the cup. Another test was the cola PH. We found the cola was poisened,the PH# was 10. Then a test was conducted on the ice cube tray.The PH level was also 10, which means it was poisined. The next piece of evidence collected was the white powder. It was found on Kendras shoes, in the fake blood and possibly the ice cube tray. The test performed was a powder study. The results of the test matched the blood powder and the powder on Kendra's shoes to. This connects the suspect to the crime because it matches perfectly to cornstarch. The last piece of evidence collected was the note impression. It was found on a cardboard back for note paper. The test performed was secret note lift. The results of the test found that the writing matched Kendra's hand writing, to confirm this we traced over it on a seperate piece of paper and compared it to the samples that we had already taken from the rest of our suspects. This connects the suspect to the crime because it proves she tried to frame Vera with the note. According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. When Alfredo went to the bathroom Kendra snuck into the scene. She smothered Felix with the white towel we found in the bathroom. She moved his cup (which was poisined) near his body to look like he was poisined. After she left the room she put Gene's clogne on the towel. She then finshed covering her tracks by making it look like Alfredo had poisined Felix. Therefore, Kendra Goode committed the crime of Felix Navidad's murder in order to inherit his money. **Rubric for Podcasts**


 * ** CATEGORY ** ||   || ** Exemplary **  ||   || ** Proficient **  ||   || ** Partially Proficient **  ||   || ** Incomplete **  ||   || ** POINTS **  ||


 * ** Introduction ** ||  || ** 3 points ** ||   || ** 2 points ** ||   || ** 1 points ** ||   || ** 0 points ** ||   || ||

introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately.__** ||   || Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds. ||  || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. ||  || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||  ||
 * || **__Catchy and clever


 * **__Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.__** ||   || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  ||   || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  ||   || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||


 * ** Content ** ||  || ** 6 points ** ||   || ** 4 points ** ||   || ** 2 points ** ||   || ** 0 points ** ||   || ||


 * || **__The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.__** ||   || The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.  ||   || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  ||   || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||   ||


 * || **__Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.__** ||   || Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  ||   || Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.  ||   || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||   ||


 * **__ The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene. __** ||   || The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene. ||   || The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene. ||   || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||


 * **__Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.__** ||   || Conclusion summarizes information.  ||   || Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information  ||   || No conclusion is provided.  ||


 * ** Delivery ** ||  || ** 3 points ** ||   || ** 2 points ** ||   || ** 1 point ** ||   || ** 0 points ** ||   || ||


 * || **__Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.__** ||   || Rehearsed, smooth delivery.  ||   || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery.  ||   || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading.  ||   ||


 * **__Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening.__** ||  || Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.  ||   || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast.  ||   || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast.  ||


 * **__Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.__** ||   || Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.  ||   || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  ||   || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||


 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** ||  || ** 3 points ** ||   || ** 2 points ** ||   || ** 1 points ** ||   || ** 0 points ** ||   || ||


 * || **__ Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation. __** ||   || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  ||   || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  ||   || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||   ||


 * **__All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.__** ||   || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  ||   || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  ||   || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||


 * ** Technical Production ** ||  || ** 3 points ** ||   || ** 2 points ** ||   || ** 1 points ** ||   || ** 0 points ** ||   || ||


 * || **__Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.__** ||   || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  ||   || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  ||   || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||   ||


 * || **__Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.__** ||   || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  ||   || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  ||   || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||   ||


 * **__ Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation. __** ||   || Volume is acceptable.  ||   || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  ||   || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||


 * **__Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.__** ||   || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  ||   || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  ||   || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||

100% ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** ||   || 57/57